Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP

An implementation of the proposed "POMP" performance monitoring interface for OpenMP applications based on IBM's dynamic instrumentation infrastructure (Dynamic Probe Class Library, or DPCL). DPOMP supports binary instrumentation of FORTRAN, C, and C++ applications.

Date Posted: December 1, 2003

Overview Requirements Download FAQs Forum Reviews There have been no evaluations for this technology during the last 30 days Write your own review on Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP Completing a review does not require your personal information, and you will not be contacted regarding your review. For questions about this technology, please visit the discussion forum. Overall: Considering all aspects of the experience, how would you rate your overall level of satisfaction with Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Capability: How satisfied are you that Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP has the functions and features to perform as expected? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Usability: How satisfied are you with the "ease of use" of Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Performance: How satisfied are you with the response time or speed with which Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP executes its functions? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Reliability: How satisfied are you with the frequency, number, and seriousness of errors in Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Installation: How satisfied were you with the ease of installation, initialization, and migration of Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Maintenance: How satisfied are you with getting updates from alphaWorks, or patches from the development team for Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Information: How satisfied are you with the accuracy, completeness, and time it takes to find information (online help, etc.) for Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Service: How satisfied are you with the effectiveness of the alphaWorks discussion forum for Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP, and responses to your e-mails? --- Select one --- 5 Very Satisfied 4 Satisfied 3 Neutral 2 Dissatisfied 1 Very Dissatisfied 0 N/A Describe the one feature or function you consider BEST about Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP. Describe the one feature or function you consider WORST about Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP. Describe the most important capability that is MISSING in Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP and should be added. Describe something NEW you would most wish to see in a future version of Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP. Provide additional COMMENTS on any of the above or anything that may not have been covered. Since learning about Dynamic Performance Monitor for OpenMP, how have you made use of it? Not yet examined or deployed this software Reviewed the code or specifications Installed/Built and ran tests with the software Integrated with other technology Are you currently an IBM partner or customer? --- Select one --- 2 No 1 Yes Please tell us your role: (check all that apply) IT Executive Non-IT Executive Consultant Manager Non-IT Professional Educator or Student Press HCI Architect/Designer Human Factors/User Researcher Visual/Industrial Designer Information Architect IT Architect/Designer Programmer/Developer Other: